- Tip No. 1: Optimize room layout
- Tip No. 2: Use moderation consciously
- Tip No. 3: Prepare your equipment well
- Tip No. 4: Actively involve the audience
- Tip No. 5: Prepare your experts
- Bonus-Tipp: After the Q&A session
- Special features of Q&A sessions at scientific conferences
- âť“ FAQ about Q&A sessions at conferences
- Room design: Visibility and proximity instead of distance between panel and audience.
- Moderation: Stay attentive and be prepared for critical questions.
- Technical aspects: Include multiple microphones, translation tools, or digital questioning tools.
- Audience: Collect questions in advance, use digital channels and lower inhibitions.
- Experts: Provide clear information about processes and roles in advance and create a sense of security.
A Q&A session acts like a magnifying glass: it delves deeper, clarifies, and gets to the heart of what was previously unclear. It’s even more frustrating, then, when it misses the mark because no one asks questions or the conversation fails to get going.
To avoid this, more than just good content is needed.
Tip No. 1: Optimize room layout
Arrange the experts in a semicircle rather than in a rigid line. This keeps the exchange lively.
Q&A sessions often fail due to the seating arrangement. Just put a few chairs on the stage and you’re done? Not enough. If the panel and audience can’t see each other, interaction suffers.
The setting plays a crucial role in determining how much interaction is even possible. One small detail that’s often overlooked: the seating arrangement of the experts.
Here’s a better way:
- Semicircle instead of row: This promotes eye contact and creates more dynamism.
- Fewer panelists: Everyone gets sufficient speaking time. This creates more space for discussion. The conversations remain lively and balanced.
- Tables should only be used in exceptional cases: Tables create a barrier between speakers and the audience. The conversation appears more formal, and the threshold for asking questions increases. If possible, use low tables.
At the 2016 ReactNext conference, the organizers set an example: The speakers sat in a semicircle instead of neatly in a line. This had several advantages: Everyone could see each other, speak more directly, and respond to each other more effectively.
With more than three people, things can get cramped on the podium. The worst seats are on the far outside, as you’re easily overlooked there. It’s better to arrange the participants in a semicircle.
Another option: a long table for the expert panel. This is what the organizers of the Zabbix Conference opted for. It can certainly be useful as a surface for water bottles, laptops, or notes.
As at the Zabbix Conference, the table should be close to the audience. And: The attendees were also seated at tables. This is typical for many software conferences where laptops and tablets are standard equipment. This creates a visual balance.
A less-than-ideal solution with Zabbix: The table wasn’t positioned centrally in front of the audience. Instead, there was an unused desk in the middle. This likely obstructed the view of the stage for some participants.
Plan a quick technical and stage check. Also, test a few seats in the audience before the session. Is the view good or obstructed?
Remove unused objects like desk or flip charts that are in the way. A clear view of the stage makes it easier for the audience to stay engaged and participate.

Side note: Campfire Q&A
The University of Birmingham recommends breaking away from traditional conference formats. Specifically, this refers to the Q&A session following a keynote address. However, the same principle applies to a panel discussion with several experts:
In the “campfire” format, several round tables are set up in the room. Participants take seats at each table, leaving one chair empty. For a set period, an expert from the panel joins the group and answers questions.
Advantages of the campfire format:
- Conversation instead of a stage: less distance, more personal interaction.
- Ideal for smaller groups: works particularly well with fewer than 100 people.
- More courage to ask questions: lower inhibition threshold, direct exchange.
Tip No. 2: Use moderation consciously
A Q&A session is unpredictable. Without a moderator, it quickly loses its focus.
A Q&A session is risky primarily because organizers relinquish some control over the proceedings.
How many questions will come from the audience? Will there be any at all? And how will the experts handle critical comments?
The moderator must be prepared for anything. The entire session hinges on this role.
Use a moderator with expertise in the subject matter. This person guides the discussions without drawing attention to themselves.
Here’s how it works:
- The moderator is already familiar with the topic or conference and can confidently lead the discussions.
- The panel and moderator get to know each other beforehand. This makes things much more relaxed on stage.
- Good moderation also means: internalizing the agenda beforehand and keeping track of time live.
At Zabbix, Rihards Olups, an experienced consultant from their own team, took over the moderation. At ReactNext, it was Boris Dinkevich – not only co-organizer of the conference, but also a long-time developer.
Some typical pitfalls in Q&A sessions:
- Questioners who ramble
- Answers that get lost in the text
- Experts who interrupt each other
An attentive moderator recognizes these moments and intervenes subtly without interrupting the flow. A good sense of timing and an intuition for when a topic should be explored in more depth or brought to a close are helpful in this regard.
What if opinions on the panel diverge? Then the moderator should give each position sufficient space. Discussions shouldn’t get out of hand, but the moderator shouldn’t stifle them either. The audience gets more out of the session when they hear different viewpoints and can then reflect on them themselves.
Another important point: Where is the moderator positioned?
Literally. At ReactNext, they were placed somewhat apart at a stand. While this didn’t obstruct the view, they were always a bit isolated.
One last point: Please leave out the PowerPoint.
A Q&A session thrives on interaction, not prepared slides. If you want to demonstrate something, include live examples or demos instead. This is especially helpful for technical topics, providing a welcome introduction.
Tip No. 3: Prepare your equipment well
Many Q&A sessions fail not due to a lack of interest, but due to technology that slows down the conversation.
During the Zabbix and ReactNext sessions, microphones were passed around very frequently. A few more of these would have benefited both conferences. This is detrimental to dynamic discussions, as each pass wastes unnecessary time.
Therefore, use either multiple microphones or throwable microphones that are quickly available even for spontaneous questions.
Auch noch wichtig vor dem Start der Q&A-Session:
- Use clip-on microphones for all speakers.
- Use multiple microphones in the hall.
- Perform a preliminary technical check: Are all microphones working?
However, the more microphones there are, the more coordination is required. Without clear rules, three people might suddenly start speaking at once.
If you’d rather avoid that and prefer something a bit more unconventional, you can experiment with a throwable microphone. It looks like a cube, is highly visible, and adds movement to the Q&A session. Where it’s appropriate, it fosters more interaction and sometimes even lifts the mood.
Tip No. 4: Actively involve the audience
Q&A sessions thrive on the courage of the participants and how easy it is made for them to express themselves.
The first question is often the biggest hurdle. Without it, the discussion remains silent.
The situation at the Zabbix session may have taken some getting used to: anyone with a question for the assembled experts had to come forward to the microphone. It was a bit like an oral exam. No wonder if that deterred some from asking their questions.
Nevertheless, the atmosphere wasn’t entirely quiet.
Perhaps because the participants perceived the hurdle as normal. Or because they came to the session well-prepared. Also because the framework was clear and everyone knew how it would work.
But: The beginning is almost always bumpy. At first, no one seems to want to contribute, and then suddenly one hand after another goes up. This tipping point determines the course of the entire session.
Here’s how to lower the barrier to asking questions:
- Mention in your initial emails that there will be a Q&A session.
- Remind people of this regularly.
- “Questions are welcome” – those who know this in advance can prepare one.
- Make it clear: there are no stupid questions.
- Offer the option to submit questions beforehand – anonymously, if desired.
This helps everyone who feels unsure of their language skills (especially at international conferences!) or prefers to formulate their thoughts in private.
Participants can also submit written questions during the session. This can be done either via the official conference app or, more prominently, via a social wall. The moderators then address these questions and incorporate them into the discussion.
And the experts benefit too:
If you share a selection of the pre-submitted questions, they will have a better idea of ​​what to expect. Sometimes the experts get nervous just as much.
Official conference guidelines also emphasize the importance of actively involving the audience in the discussion. For example, the Q&A guide for the ISPOR conference on health economics recommends not only expecting questions from the audience but also asking them yourself as a panelist. Asking “What challenges have you encountered?” encourages the audience to share their own experiences and engage in a dialogue.
Tip No. 5: Prepare your experts
Anyone on stage should know what they are getting into. A Q&A session thrives on everyone involved feeling confident. This includes not only the questioners but also the experts.
Inform your panel experts about the schedule, moderation, and potential topics well in advance so they can respond confidently during the session.
As soon as the date, time, and location of the conference (and especially the Q&A session!) are confirmed, send out initial information. This will allow everyone to prepare accordingly.
When publishing a short profile of the experts on the conference website, specifically request a brief biography and a recent photo.
One to two weeks before the conference is a suitable time for a second, more detailed announcement.
This should answer questions about the exact procedure of the Q&A session.
- Who will moderate the session?
- What is the exact format? Will there be introductions? Are there thematic blocks?
- How are the questions from the audience received?
- Are the experts expected to prepare anything?
This is also the moment to (re)introduce the experts that no one needs to bring a PowerPoint presentation. Remind them that the focus is on dialogue.
In their guide to Q&A sessions, Streeter and Miller (2011) recommend that moderators and panelists always take questions seriously, listen actively, and ask follow-up questions if necessary to better grasp the core message.
- Respond honestly: If no one has an answer, admit it openly or return the question to the audience.
- Remain respectful: Don’t ridicule a question or respond with “You should already know that…”
- Recognize opinions: Sometimes questions are disguised comments. Thank the audience for their input without stifling the discussion..
Bonus-Tipp: After the Q&A session
After the Q&A session, once the session is over, there’s one last step: Thank everyone. This is also part of good communication and will be remembered.
You may have conducted a survey among the attendees in the meantime, and they may have praised the session. That would definitely be worth mentioning in your thank-you email. A brief thank you with genuine praise is always well-received and motivates people to attend again next time.
Special features of Q&A sessions at scientific conferences
In academic settings, Q&A sessions are particularly important. They allow for questions to be posed to researchers, facilitate exchange, and offer insights into new research perspectives.
At the same time, they present organizers with unique challenges that can quickly become stumbling blocks in the day-to-day running of conferences.
Typical pitfalls of conference Q&As and how to deal with them:
- Overcoming language barriers: At international conferences, participants whose native language is not the conference language often ask questions. Formulating such a question (and then asking it in front of everyone!) is challenging. The question may sometimes be incorrectly phrased or difficult to understand due to an accent.
- Solution: Moderators repeat the question in their own words. Ask the person to rephrase the question. If that doesn’t work either, offer to clarify the question directly with the person after the session.
- Managing highly specific technical questions: Sometimes participants ask extremely detailed questions. This carries the risk of losing most of the audience.
- Solution: The moderator summarizes the question in a generally understandable way or postpones detailed discussions to the follow-up discussion.
- Interdisciplinary panels: Many scientific sessions bring together experts from different disciplines. Questions are often only relevant to a portion of the panel.
- Solution: The moderator strategically distributes questions and solicits diverse perspectives. This allows the entire panel to participate.
- Hierarchies and power imbalances: Early-career researchers sometimes hesitate to ask critical questions of established researchers.
- Solution: Allow anonymous questions via a conference app or actively encourage the audience: “Even controversial questions are welcome.”
âť“ FAQ about Q&A sessions at conferences
How do I best introduce a Q&A session at a conference?
The best approach is to start with a clear invitation, e.g., “Questions are expressly welcome.” It’s also helpful to ask the first question yourself or to use a prepared question to break the ice.
What mistakes should you absolutely avoid during a Q&A session?
Mistakes include: not allocating enough time, ridiculing questions from the audience, stifling discussions, or not actively involving the audience.
How long should a Q&A session be?
For panels, 45-60 minutes is a good length. It’s important to allow enough time for multiple questions without running over time.
How do experts deal with critical or uncomfortable questions?
Listen respectfully. React calmly and answer the question objectively. If you don’t have a suitable answer, say so honestly. Or pass the question back to the other panelists – or to the audience.
How can you encourage participants to submit questions in advance?
Encourage participants to submit questions online or via a conference app beforehand. This way, you’ll already have a selection of questions. Experience shows that once the first questions are asked, more will naturally follow during the session.
❌Please don’t just have lectures! Structure the rest of the program similarly to a Q&A session and involve the audience more. Here are some other mistakes you should avoid as a conference organizer.
đź’ˇAsking the right questions can sometimes lead to brilliant ideas that enhance any conference program. Find out which questions will get you there here.